The Custody Detention Scrutiny Panel provides independent oversight of police custody detention processes and decision making.
Its purpose is to ensure that individuals detained in police custody are treated fairly, lawfully and with dignity, and that custody practices are consistent with relevant legislation, policies and professional standards.
By providing an independent perspective on police custody, the Panel helps strengthen public confidence in policing. It also demonstrates that decisions made within the custody environment are subject to meaningful, external scrutiny.
The Panel reviews a selection of custody detention cases to assess whether they have been managed appropriately and in accordance with legal, procedural and ethical requirements. In doing so, members consider the rationale for police decisions, the quality of custody records, and the impact of decisions on detainees, particularly those who may be vulnerable.
Areas of Key Focus
The Panel’s scrutiny activity focuses on:
- Lawfulness, necessity and rationale of detention decisions and the use of police powers;
- Safeguarding, vulnerability and disproportionality, including how the needs of vulnerable individuals are identified and addressed; and
- Quality, accuracy and timeliness of custody records, ensuring decisions and actions are appropriately documented.
Through this work, the Panel provides assurance to the public, promotes transparency and accountability, and supports continuous improvement in custody detention practices.
Panel Membership
To support efficient and constructive meetings, the Panel consists of 10-12 participants. They are drawn from Independent Custody Visitors (ICVs), Tees, Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust’s Liaison and Diversion Team, the Youth Justice Service, Custody Navigators and representatives from MIND Appropriate Adults Scheme.
Terms of Reference
The Panel’s Terms of Reference can be viewed here
Scrutiny Outcomes and Assurance Reports
Following each meeting, a Scrutiny Outcomes and Assurance Report is produced. It provides a clear summary of the Panel’s observations, findings and recommendations in relation to the cases reviewed.